1. Home
  2. Articles
  3. ANSI vs EN388: Understanding the Global Standards for Cut Resistance
Resources

ANSI vs EN388: Understanding the Global Standards for Cut Resistance

June 20, 2025 · 2 min read

Mingda protective fabric

ANSI vs EN388: Understanding the Global Standards for Cut Resistance
When it comes to hand protection, not all standards speak the same language. Two of the most recognized testing systems for cut-resistant gloves and materials are:

ANSI/ISEA 105 (primarily used in the United States)

EN 388 (European Union standard, adopted globally in many countries)

While both aim to evaluate the performance of protective gloves, their methodologies and classification systems differ—sometimes dramatically.

1. Test Methodology
ANSI/ISEA 105 (Cut Resistance):
Uses the TDM-100 testing machine.
Measures the grams of force required to cut through the material with a straight blade.
Cut levels range from A1 to A9, with A9 = highest protection (6000+ grams).
EN388 (Cut Resistance):
Originally used the Coup Test with a rotating circular blade.
Since 2016, added the ISO 13997 test (TDM-based), especially when dulling of the blade occurs.
Cut levels range from A to F, with F = highest protection.

2. Comparison Chart

Feature ANSI/ISEA 105 EN 388
Main Region USA & North America EU, Asia, global
Test Type TDM-100 (ISO 13997) Coup test + ISO 13997
Cut Levels A1 – A9 A – F
Units of Measurement Grams of force Newtons
Higher Number = Safer? Yes Yes


3. Practical Implications

Why does this matter for users and distributors?
A glove rated A6 in ANSI may not always be the same as a glove rated E in EN388, even if the cut resistance looks similar.
Compliance & certification varies by market — e.g., EU buyers need EN388, US buyers prefer ANSI.
Choosing the wrong rating may lead to insufficient protection in high-risk applications such as glass handling or sheet metal work.

4. For International Buyers
If you’re sourcing gloves or fabrics from China, always confirm:
Which standard the product complies with.
Whether the test method is ISO 13997 (preferred globally).
If you need a dual-certified glove (ANSI + EN388) for wider acceptance.

Conclusion
Both ANSI and EN388 offer essential insights into product performance—but knowing their differences ensures better safety decisions.
At Mingda Protection Textile, we provide globally compliant solutions, tailored to your industry’s demands. From ANSI A9 to EN388 F-rated fabrics and gloves, we’ve got you covered.

Safety isn’t just a feature—it’s a science.

The figures quoted in this article describe materials in general. The material data for the construction you are buying — weight, count, composition and the test report for the lot — is issued with the sales documents for your order, and the certification of a finished garment belongs to the garment maker who builds it.

Related reading

Let’s talk about your fabric requirements

Tell us the application, the required weight and the standard you need to meet. Our technical team will come back with a matching fabric, the spec sheet and a quotation.

Scroll to Top